mercredi 23 janvier 2019

Search for EPL star Emiliano Sala's missing plane called off with 'no hope' of survivors



Fading light forced police to call off a search for the stricken plane carrying English Premier League footballer Emiliano Sala with a rescuer claiming there was no hope of finding any survivors.
Sala and pilot David Ibbotson are missing after their private plane vanished from radar on Monday (Tuesday NZT) on a flight between Nantes, in France and Cardiff.
Sala - who had signed for EPL club Cardiff City from FC Nantes – sent a fearful voice message to his father in Argentina, saying: "I'm on a plane that looks like it's going to fall apart."
Guernsey Police told the BBC an "intensive" nine-hour search had found no trace of the missing aircraft on Wednesday night (Thursday morning NZT).
Channel Islands Air Search chief officer John Fitzgerald told the BBC "even the most fit person" would only survive for a few hours in the water.
Police will decide on Thursday whether to resume the search, which was halted after night fell.
Rescue aircraft and boats searched more than 2590 square km of sea single-engine Piper Malibu by midday on Tuesday.
Guernsey police resume the search on Wednesday. 
"Two planes are taking off and will search a targeted area we believe has the highest likelihood of finding anything, based on review of the tides and weather since it went missing," a police spokesman said.
The 28-year-old Argentine-born forward joined struggling Cardiff City from FC Nantes last week for a club record fee of about $US19 million ($NZ28 million), after scoring 12 goals for the French club this season.
In a voice message left by Sala, published by Argentine newspaper Clarin, he said it seemed as though the plane was "about to crash".
The plane had been cruising at 5000ft when the pilot requested to descend to a lower altitude on passing Guernsey. It lost radar contact at 2300ft, police said.
They said they had seen a number of floating objects in the water on Tuesday but had been unable to determine whether they were from the missing aircraft.
The police said they had found no signs of those on board and that if the aircraft landed on water, the chances of survival were slim.

lundi 21 janvier 2019

Moroccan Mirage F1 fighter crashed after a technical malfunction



A Dassault Mirage F1 air-superiority fighter and attack aircraft crashed after a technical malfunction in Morocco on 21 January.
The Moroccan air force Mirage F1 fighter jet crashed on landing while making a routine training mission, according to the Royal Air Force officials.
The crash of A Mirage F1 fighter jet from the Royal Moroccan Air Force (RMAF) occurred around 12:30 local time in the Taounate region.
The pilot ejected before the crash and is being evaluated for injury, according to the Morocco World News news agency.
During 1975, the RMAF has ordered 30 Mirage F1CHs and 20 Mirage F1EHs fighter jets.
This is not the first time such an accident has occurred. A Royal Air Force Mirage F1 aircraft crashed in 2015, south of the Sidi Slimane Air Base.
The RMAF lost seven Mirages as a result of hostile fire, along with a further seven which had crashed due to different mishaps
The Dassault Mirage F1 is a French-made fighter and attack aircraft designed and manufactured by Dassault Aviation. It was developed as a successor to the popular Mirage III family.

dimanche 20 janvier 2019

F-35 Weaponry



Evolving threats make air superiority more important than ever. And only the F-35 can provide the United States and allied forces around the world with the strength needed to defeat threats while maintaining unmatched situational awareness.





In stealth mode, the F-35 can infiltrate enemy territory that other fighters can’t, carrying 5,700 pounds of internal ordnance. Once air dominance is established, the F-35 converts to beast mode, carrying up to 22,000 pounds of combined internal and external weapons, to return to the battle to finish the fight

jeudi 17 janvier 2019

RIP F-22 and F-35: How Russia or China Could Shoot Down America's Stealth Fighters


We explain the tech behind the idea. 


Once either China or Russia manages to put together a long wave IRST, high-speed data-links, and the computers and algorithms for multi-ship sensor fusion, the ability of U.S. fifth-generation fighters to operate independently will diminish.
With Boeing and the United States Navy explaining in detail how a combination of long-wave infrared search & track combined with high-speed multi-ship data networking and advanced sensor fusion algorithms can generate a weapons quality track on an enemy stealth fighter, it is only a matter of time before adversaries such as Russia and China develop similar capabilities.
Both Moscow and Beijing have most of the elements needed to develop and field counter-stealth technologies similar to that demonstrated by the U.S. Navy and Boeing during Fleet Exercise 2017 onboard a pair of modified F/A-18E/F Super Hornets using a combination of the powerful DTP-N processor, TTNT high-speed IP-based data-network and the long-wave Block II Infrared Search and Track (IRST) pod. The U.S. Navy will be fielding its new counter-stealth capabilities in the coming years as the Block III Super Hornet enters service in 2022. Given that both the Russians and the Chinese possess the individual elements of all the required technologies to replicate the U.S. Navy’s capabilities, it is only a matter of time before Moscow and Beijing start to field similar counter-stealth abilities.
The Russians—as Center for Naval Analyses research scientist Michael Kofman noted—have had infrared search and track sensors onboard their fighter aircraft for decades. Even the earliest versions of the Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum and the Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker have had an IRST system installed. The Russians have continued to field modern fighters such as the Sukhoi Su-30SM and Su-35S with newer and more modern IRST technology even if the detection ranges are fairly unimpressive. Even the forthcoming Su-57 PAK-FA incorporates the 101KS-V infrared search and track system. “Like every Russian plane has a giant IRST pod in the front for the past 30 years,” Kofman said.
However, it is unclear what infrared wavelength the Russian systems use—but it is likely that it uses mid-wave infrared. Most military airborne infrared sensors tend to use middle wavelengths because of the good compromise between range and resolution capability. Long wave infrared was typically less common because while that part of the spectrum offers excellent range capability—and the ability to pick up extremely cool objects—those sensors were traditionally limited by poor resolution and clutter. However, the advantage is that a good long wave infrared sensor will be sensitive enough to pick up the heat generated by the disturbance of the airflow and skin friction of an aircraft travelling through the atmosphere.
Long wave infrared (LWIR) has long been a holy grail of sorts for the Defense Department. “Sensitivity could most directly be provided by developing detectors that responded in the 8–12-µm-long wavelength IR (LWIR) band. The LWIR band is a highly desired operating band because it provides the most signal for a given difference in temperature between an object and its background (e.g., when imaging terrestrial objects),” David Schmieder and James Teague wrote at the Defense Systems Information Analysis Center . “Unfortunately, that band is also one of the most difficult for detectors to work in because long-wavelength photons have lower energy than short-wavelength photons. So detecting LWIR photons also means detecting other low-energy products, such as latent heat-generated dark current and its associated noise.”
Boeing has largely solved the problems associated with noise, clutter and resolution using new algorithms and the enormous processing power of the DTP-N computer onboard the Block III Super Hornet. The result is a sensor that is sensitive enough to detect airborne targets at extended ranges beyond the capability of even an active electronically scanned array radar such as the Raytheon AN/APG-79. Nor is there any hiding from a long-wave infrared sensor—since the camera can pick up the heat generated by disturbance of air molecules or sunlight absorbed by an aircraft skin and emitted as background heat.
 
“If the enemy aircraft coming at you is low radar cross section—low radar signature—it is still emitting a heat signature,” Bob Kornegay, Boeing’s capture team leader for domestic F/A-18E/F and EA-18G programs, said. “So it helps us as the enemies are starting to develop their stealth aircraft. It helps us to defeat that by moving outside of that X-band range.”
The fact of the matter is that both the Russian and Chinese defense industries have experience building IRST sensors and should be able to develop a long wave infrared search and track pod without too much difficulty. By the same token, both the Russians and the Chinese have access to airborne data-networking capability. The Russian Mikoyan MiG-31 Foxhound is equipped with RK-RLDN and APD-518, the later of which can coordinate a flight of four jets. Newer Russian fighters such as the Su-30SM, Su-35S and the Su-57 also incorporate datalinks—as do their Chinese counterparts. However, the speed and throughput of these datalinks remain in question, but it is all but a certainty that both Moscow and Beijing have the wherewithal to develop high-speed high band airborne datalinks. Once the Russians and Chinese have the ability to link two or more longwave IRST-equipped jets via a high speed link, they would have most of the ingredients needed to build a counter-stealth capability.
That leaves the question of Russia and China being able to develop advanced sensor fusion algorithms, which is a challenging undertaking even for American defense contractors. It will take time, but it is likely that both nations have the ability to develop such software and the computing hardware to make it work. Beijing, which has more access to external sources of computing technology, is more likely to be able to develop such an avionics package first in the the relative near term. However, Russia will also probably be able to develop a similar capability given time—and possibly access to foreign processors from China perhaps if sanctions are not lifted. Once either China or Russia manages to put together a long wave IRST, high-speed data-links, and the computers and algorithms for multi-ship sensor fusion, the ability of U.S. fifth-generation fighters to operate independently will diminish. Indeed, the U.S. Air Force anticipated this development—the service noted that its F-22 Raptor would be increasingly challenged by the 2030s by new enemy capabilities.
“The timeline associated with pursuing F-22 production restart would see new F-22 deliveries starting in the mid-to-late 2020s,” the Air Force said in a 2017 report to Congress detailing F-22 production restart costs . “While the F-22 continues to remain the premier air superiority solution against the current threat, new production deliveries would start at a point where the F-22' s capabilities will begin to be challenged by the advancing threats in the 2030 and beyond timeframe.”
Indeed, while engineers could eventually divine a way to defeat long wave IRST tracking of a stealth aircraft, such technologies would likely have to be integrated onto an aircraft from the outset of the design. It unlikely that such technologies could be retrofitted, thus current stealth aircraft will likely be increasingly vulnerable as the Pentagon anticipated.

mardi 15 janvier 2019

Mirage Fighter jet crash : missing crew found dead



The crew of a French fighter jet that crashed Wednesday has been found dead, the country's air force has confirmed.
A search was launched for Captain Baptiste Chirié and Lieutenant Audrey Michelon after debris from their Dassault Mirage 2000D was found in the mountainous Jura region of eastern France.
The crew were on a routine low-altitude training flight when radar contact was lost on the morning of January 9, the French air force said in a statement. The jet, which belonged to the Nancy-Ochey Air Base, was flying over the mountainous region between the Doubs and Jura areas.
    Chirié had 940 hours of flying experience and had taken part in 24 war missions, said air force chief of staff General Philippe Lavigne, while Michelon had taken part in 97 war missions and had 1250 hours of experience.
    During a press conference Thursday, air force spokesman Colonel Cyrille Duvivier said the jet's wreckage had been found, as well as fabric that was likely to belong to a parachute.
    "On this type of fighter jet you have two types of parachute, one for the crew in the ejector seat and the jet's parachute, which can be used to brake once it lands," Duvivier explained.
    The air force did not detect a distress signal from the jet, he added; a signal is usually triggered when a pilot ejects.
      The search for the missing crew members was restarted at 8 a.m. on Thursday, with 138 police officers involved in the operation, a spokesman for the national police said. Speaking to radio station France Bleu, a rescue worker said the site of the crash "wasn't an easy area to access."
      The Metz public prosecutor's office has opened an investigation into the incident, a spokeswoman told CNN.

      lundi 14 janvier 2019

      Watch Five Different U.S. Fighter Jets Fly Together In Formation ( Video )


      An F-35A and F-16 from Edwards AFB join an F-15E and F-22 from the 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron out of Nellis AFB, and an F-18 from Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 31 out of Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, to fly in a formation flight during exercise Orange Flag on December 13, 2018. Orange Flag was developed by the 412th Operations Group to evaluate teamwork across the separate United States services to integrate joint forces across a wide range of mission areas. The events enable the test community to capture data to assess the interoperability of multiple aircraft platforms in an environment outside of traditional Edwards testing. In addition to the fighter jets, B-52, B-2 and B-1 bombers participated in Orange Flag along with KC-135 and KC-10 aerial refueling tankers. “The latest event involved a total of 18 aircraft in six combat-relevant test tasks and experiments.” said Maj. Christopher Campbell, Air Force Test Center, Orange Flag Evaluation Director. Campbell said the team will analyze the data collected and apply it to develop new air power capabilities. Film Credits: U.S. Air Force Video by Ethan Wagner

      dimanche 13 janvier 2019

      12 Fun Facts About The F-14 Tomcat


      1) The F-14 made its first flight nearly 48 years ago, on December 21, 1970.


      2) The F-14 was the largest and heaviest US fighter to fly from an aircraft carrier.


      3) Depending on wing sweep, the fuselage provides between 40-60% of the total lift for the F-14.


      4) The F-14 was the only launch platform for the AIMG-54 Phoenix missile, and it could carry up to 6 of the 1,000 pound missiles at a time.


      5) The F-14 had one of the most powerful radars available at the time - it was able to track up to 24 targets at once.


      6) The F-14 had incredible flexibility - it served as the Navy's maritime air superiority fighter, fleet defense interceptor, and aerial reconnaissance platform. That's three very different roles for one jet.


      7) The only country currently operating the F-14 is...Iran.


      8) The F-14s were exported to Iran in 1976, when the US had positive diplomatic relations with the country.


      9) The F-14s wings can be 'overswept' to 75 degrees to save space on aircraft carriers.


      10) During testing, an F-14 was landed on an aircraft carrier with an asymmetrical wing sweep.


      11) The F-14 doesn't have ailerons. Instead, it uses wing spoilers at low speeds, and differential 'tailerons' at high speed.


      12) The last F-14 combat mission was flown in 2006, but the 'Tomcat' is still one of the most unique, impressive, and fastest military aircraft ever built.




      5 Most Lethal Aircraft Carriers of All Time


      Carriers provide a unique combination of presence, prestige and lethality that continues to make them attractive to the world’s most powerful navies.


      The first true aircraft carriers entered service at the end of World War I, as the Royal Navy converted several of its excess warships into large, floating airfields. During the interwar period, Japan and the United States would make their own conversions, and all three navies would supplement these ships with purpose-built carriers. Within months of the beginning of hostilities in September 1939, the carrier demonstrated its worth in a variety of maritime tasks.
      By the end of 1941, carriers would become the world’s dominant capital ship. These are the five most lethal carriers to serve in the world’s navies, selected on the basis of their contribution to critical operations, and on their longevity and resilience.
      USS Enterprise
      The U.S. Navy supplemented Lexington and Saratoga, the most effective of the interwar battlecruiser conversions, with the purpose-built USS Ranger. Experience with all three ships demonstrated that the next purpose-built class would require a larger hull and flight deck, as well as a heavier anti-aircraft armament. This resulted in USS Yorktown and USS Enterprise, which along with their third sister (USS Hornet) would play a critical role in stopping the Imperial Japanese Navy’s advance in 1942. Capable of cruising at 33 knots, Enterprise displaced around 24,000 tons and could carry up to 90 aircraft.
      While both Hornet and Yorktown were lost in the carrier battles of 1942, Enterprise served throughout the entire war. She helped search for the Japanese fleet in the wake of Pearl Harbor, and carried out the first reprisal raids in the early months of the war. She escorted Hornet on the Doolittle Raid, then helped sink four Japanese flattops at the Battle of Midway. She filled a crucial role during the Battles of Guadalcanal, surviving several near-catastrophic Japanese attacks.
      Later in the war, Enterprise operated with the growing American carrier fleet as it formed core of the counter-offensive that would roll up Japanese possessions in the Pacific. Enterprise fought at Philippine Sea and Leyte Gulf, helping to destroy the heart of Japanese naval aviation. She served in the final raids against Japan in 1945 until a kamikaze caused critical damage in May. Returning to service just as the war ended, she helped return American soldiers to the United States in Operation Magic Carpet. Enterprise was the most decorated ship in any navy during World War II, but sadly post-war preservation efforts failed, and the carrier was scrapped in 1960.
      HMS Illustrious
      Between September 1939 and April 1942, the Royal Navy lost five of its seven pre-war aircraft carriers. HMS Illustrious and her three sisters filled the gap. Laid down in 1937, Illustrious traded aircraft complement for an armored deck, an innovation that would make the ship more robust than her Japanese or American counterparts. Displacing 23,000 tons, Illustrious could make 30 knots and carrying 36 aircraft.
      Illustrious’ first major achievement came in November 1940, when her Swordfish torpedo bombers attacked the battleships of the Italian navy at anchor at Taranto. The attack, carried out on a shoestring compared to the great raids of the Pacific War, nevertheless managed to sink or heavily damage three Italian battleships. Illustrious spent the next few months carrying out raids in the Mediterranean and covering the evacuation of Greece. In the course of the latter, she survived several hits from German divebombers.
      After receiving repairs in the United States, Illustrious operated against the Japanese in the Indian Ocean. She returned to the European theater in 1943, making additional raids on Norway and in support of Allied landings in Italy. Later Illustrious returned to the Pacific, where supplied with superior American carrier aircraft, she helped spearhead the Royal Navy counter-offensive into Southeast Asia. After surviving a kamikaze attack, she returned to Great Britain and eventually served as a training carrier before being scrapped in 1957.
      HIJMS Zuikaku
      Zuikaku represented the zenith of pre-war Japanese carrier development. Along with her sister Shokaku, Zuikaku filled out Kido Butai with the addition of two large, fast, modern carriers. Displacing 32,000 tons and capable of carrying 72 aircraft, Zuikaku could make 34 knots, and absorb a relatively large amount of battle damage.
      The size and modernity of the carriers meant that they could handle a greater operational tempo early in the war. After the Pearl Harbor raid, they participated in the Indian Ocean Raid, helping to sink the British carrier Hermes and several other ships. Afterward, Zuikaku and her sister deployed to Port Moresby to cover Japanese landings in what became the Battle of Coral Sea. Zuikaku survived undamaged, and contributed to the sinking of USS Lexington, but because of a lack of aircraft could not participate in the Battle of Midway.
      Zuikaku continued to form the core of the Japanese carrier fleet into 1944, participating in and surviving the battles of Guadalcanal (where her aircraft helped sink USS Hornet) and the Battle of Philippine Sea. By October 1944, her supply of aircraft and pilots was almost completely exhausted. At the Battle of Leyte Gulf, Zuikaku and several other carriers served as bait for Halsey’s battleships and carriers, luring them away from the center of the Japanese attack. The last survivor of the Pearl Harbor attack, Zuikaku sank under a barrage of bombs and torpedoes.
      USS Midway
      USS Midway entered service in September 1945, shortly after the end of hostilities against Japan. She displaced 45,000 tons, could make 33 knots, and could carry roughly 100 aircraft. Midway and her sisters represented a step beyond the Essex-class carriers that had won the Pacific War, and promised to introduce a new era of naval aviation.
      Upon commissioning, Midway became the world’s most lethal aircraft carrier. The offensive power of her air group exceeded that of the Essex carriers then in service, and with the introduction of jet aircraft the gap would grow. With the A-2 Savage carrier-based bomber, Midway and her sisters briefly became the only carriers in the world capable of delivering nuclear weapons.
      Midway underwent extensive modification over the course of her career, eventually acquiring an angled flight deck and other innovations. Although she missed Korea, Midway operated off Vietnam, and continued to serve as the larger “supercarriers” came online. She found heavy use in the Gulf War of 1990, as her (relative) small size gave her an advantage in maneuverability over the more modern supercarriers. Midway left service in 1992, having spanned the history of naval aviation from the F6F Hellcat to the F/A-18 Hornet.
      USS Theodore Roosevelt
      The ten Nimitz-class nuclear aircraft carriers have been the world’s dominant capital ships since they began to enter service in the late 1970s. Constructed over a period spanning nearly 35 years, the class continues to provide the core of American naval power. Among the most active of the Nimitz class has been the USS Theodore Roosevelt, first of the second group of ships. Roosevelt entered service in 1986; she displaces over 100,000 tons, carries between 75-80 aircraft, and can make 30 knots top speed.
      Roosevelt has served in most of the conflicts of the post Cold-War era. In 1991 she launched strikes against Iraqi targets during Operation Desert Storm. In 1999, her aircraft conducted strikes in Kosovo and Serbia in service of Operation Allied Force. After the September 11 attacks, Roosevelt deployed to the Middle East and participated in the first sorties against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Operation Enduring Freedom. Two years later, her aircraft flew against Iraqi targets again in the first days of Operation Iraqi Freedom. After a refit, Roosevelt launched strikes against both Afghan and Iraqi targets in the latter part of the decade. Most recently, Roosevelt helped blockade Yemeni ports against a suspected Iranian arms convoy.
      Like her sister ships, Roosevelt has already undergone substantial modification across the course of her thirty year career, and the Navy expects that these refits will continue into the future. Current projections suggest that she will leave service around 2035, which would give the carrier a nearly fifty-year span of lethality.
      Wrap
      Pundits and analysts have predicted the obsolescence and demise of the aircraft carrier since the waning days of World War II. At the moment, however, the Russian, Indian, British, Chinese, French, and American navies continue to put faith, and resources, into carrier aviation. Despite the vulnerability of the big ships to attack, they provide a unique combination of presence, prestige, and lethality that continues to make them attractive to the world’s most powerful navies.

      by Robert Farley

      samedi 12 janvier 2019

      Why the Light Attack Aircraft Is So Important to the Air Force?


      Now is the time and the LAA procurement is the right program for the U.S. Air Force to demonstrate that it can be an agile, smart buyer, able to cut years off of its heretofore ponderous acquisition timelines.

      Later this month, the U.S. Air Force says that it will release the long-anticipated Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Light Attack Aircraft (LAA). Although it will be a relatively small program in budgetary terms, it could have profound implications for the way the air force supports the new National Defense Strategy, grows its number of combat squadrons, engages with allies and partners, and reforms a cumbersome and expensive acquisition system.
      One impetus for the LAA program is the well-established need to provide less costly air support for low-intensity counter-insurgency and counterterrorism operations such as in Afghanistan and eastern Syria. Currently, the U.S. military employs a variety of high-end warplanes to conduct close air support missions in these conflicts, including B-1s, F-15s, F-16s and F-18s, A-10s and MQ-9 Reaper drones. While highly effective, these platforms are expensive to sustain. Their use in low-intensity missions also detracts from the air force’s ability to prepare for the potential threat of high-intensity conflict. Facing a sustainment bow wave in the next five years as existing fighter fleets continue to age and new platforms place additional burdens on the maintenance and supply systems, it is imperative that the air force find ways of lowering its operating costs.
      The air force has already demonstrated the viability of this strategy in Afghanistan. For a number of years, the U.S. Air Force has been working to provide the Afghan Air Force (AAF) with a light attack/reconnaissance capability built around a variant of the Embraer Super Tucano, the A-29. Twenty-two of twenty-six planned aircraft have been deliveredto date. The program also provided training for Afghan pilot and maintainers.
      The Afghan A-29 program has been remarkably successful. Since it began conducting combat operations with the aircraft some two years ago, the AAF has flown their A-29s more than 100,000 hours while steadily improving its overall effectiveness and expanding the range of missions it can perform to include night operations and the employment of laser-guided munitions. It was reported that last year the AAF’s small number of A-29s were conducting one-third of that service’s close air support missions, dropping their ordinance with great accuracy and reducing the number of collateral casualties.
      The LAA procurement is a test of that service’s commitment to acquisition reform. It is the proverbial poster child for acquisition reform. The program seeks to provide a new capability rapidly, based on acquiring non-developmental platforms and using experimentation to reduce risk and better inform decisionmakers. As currently defined, the LAA will not be a massive, decades-long major acquisition program involving years of development and testing. All the preparatory work has been accomplished, including an experiment involving flying two candidate aircraft, an enhanced version of the A-29 and a variant of the venerable T-6 trainer, the AT-6. Instead, at least initially, it will involve the rapid procurement of a relatively small number of platforms, allowing the air force to develop the appropriate tactics, concepts of operations and sustainment protocols.
      As the date for the release of the LAA RFP approaches, the air force has one last chance to better define its requirements for the aircraft. If it has any intention of sending its own pilots or those of its partner air forces into combat in the LAA, then the platform’s combat capability must be the number one requirement. Because its primary role will be in low-intensity conflicts largely involving countries with underdeveloped infrastructure, the ability to operate from and be maintained on austere locations should be requirement number two. Overall sustainment costs, not just the unit price of the aircraft, should be a third area of concern.
      The air force has repeatedly asserted that the LAA procurement will be a best-value competition. But unless it defines those characteristics and capabilities which it values, the competition is in danger of degenerating into a lowest-price shootout that could place air force pilots at risk and undermine its credibility in foreign markets.
      At the end of the day, air force leadership needs to trust those instincts that led it to initially propose the rapid acquisition of an LAA. The wear-and-tear on high-end platforms must be reduced while maintaining a capability to provide close air support in low-intensity conflicts. Building a network of partner air forces flying the same platforms and exchanging intelligence rests on a decision by the U.S. Air Force to acquire and operate some number of the same platform. Simply put, if we fly it they will come.
      Now is the time and the LAA procurement is the right program for the U.S. Air Force to demonstrate that it can be an agile, smart buyer, able to cut years off of its heretofore ponderous acquisition timelines. It should rapidly acquire enough LAAs, say fifty initially, to allow it to understand how to organize, train, equip and employ such a force (particularly in the context of the service’s larger, evolving force structure). Then the air force should revisit the future of the program after it has had time to employ this new capability in real-world situations.
       
      Daniel Gouré, Ph.D., is a vice president at the public-policy research think tank Lexington Institute. Goure has a background in the public sector and U.S. federal government, most recently serving as a member of the 2001 Department of Defense Transition Team. You can follow him on Twitter at @dgoure and the Lexington Institute @LexNextDC. Read his full bio here.

      jeudi 3 janvier 2019

      Air Force helicopter crashes in Boko Haram combat


      A Nigerian Air Force (NAF) helicopter crashed in combat on Wednesday night while providing close air support to troops of 145 Battalion at Damasak in Northern Borno State. Air Commodore Ibikunle Daramola, Director of Public Relations and Information disclosed this, but he did not disclose the model of the helicopter or how many personnel were inside it at the time the crash happened. Nigerian Air Force has over a dozen of Russian made helicopters, MMil Mi-17 and Mil Mi-24 models.

      Daramola said the aircraft was involved in the ongoing counterinsurgency operations in the North East.




       “The incident, occurred about 7:45 pm , 2 January 2019. Details of the cause of the crash are still scanty”, he said. “As soon as the details of the crash are known, they will be made available to the public”, Daramola added. The loss happened hours after Daramola informed the nation that The Air Task Force (ATF) of Operation LAFIYA DOLE destroyed a building being used as meeting venue by Boko Haram fighters near Baga in Northern Borno State. “The attack”, he said, “was conducted 1 Jan 2019, after series of Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions confirmed that the building was being used as an assembly point by the terrorists. Consequently, the ATF dispatched a NAF Alpha Jet aircraft to attack the building.”

      “A direct hit was recorded on the target leading to significant damage to the structure and neutralisation of the occupants”, he added.

      mardi 1 janvier 2019

      Super Eagle to supplement US Air Force 5th-gen combat capabilities


      The Pentagon has announced plans for a US$1.2 billion purchase of 12 upgraded Boeing F-15X fighter aircraft as part of the 2020FY budget request to support the US Air Force’s fleet of legacy and fifth-generation fighters.

      As part of the planned recapitalisation and modernisation program of the US Air Force's (USAF) legacy fighter fleet and to supplement the growing fleet of fifth-generation F-22 and F-35 series aircraft, the Pentagon has announced the planned purchase of 12 advanced Boeing F-15X aircraft. 
      If approved by the Pentagon and the USAF, it would mark the first F-15 purchase by the service since 2001 when it procured additional F-15E Strike Eagle variants. 
      The F-15X was developed following an Air Force inquiry into both Boeing and Lockheed Martin regarding the introduction of a new air combat platform that was capable of "seamlessly plug[ing] into their existing air combat infrastructure as part of better-defined high-low capability mix strategy".
      Developed as an evolution of the 45-year-old F-15 design, the F-15X provides a number of key capability and technology improvements over the legacy, fourth-generation F-15 platform, including: 
      • Flat-panel glass cockpits supporting fly-by-wire controls; 
      • Digital Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System II helmet mounted display (HMD); 
      • Revised internal wing structure; 
      • Upgraded APG-82 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar systems;
      • Low-profile head-up display systems; 
      • Upgraded radio and satellite communications; 
      • The Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) electronic warfare and electronic surveillance suite; and Legion pod-mounted infrared search and track (ISRT) system.  
      These additions, particularly the enhanced wing structure enable the integration of Boeing's new AMBER missile carrying racks, enabling the F-15X to carry 22 air-to-air missiles during a single sortie. Alternatively, the AMBER racks would enable the F-15X to carry eight air-to-air missiles and 28 Small Diameter Bombs (SDBs), or up to seven 2,000-pound bombs and eight air-to-air missiles.
      In contrast, the legacy F-15C/D platform can carry eight air-to-air missiles currently, while the specialised F-15SA manufactured for Saudi Arabia is capable of carrying a dozen such missiles. 

      This weapons carrying capability enhances the USAF's air combat capability by integrating into the broader force structure, filling niche roles supporting fifth-generation, low observable platforms like the F-22 and F-35, which can leverage their key fifth-generation force multipliers, including low observability shaping and materials, high-performance air frames, sensor fusion and network-centric capabilities as part of a renewed push for 'distributed lethality'.
      In particular, the large air-to-air weapons payload of the F-15X can support F-22 and F-35 platforms operating in stealth configuration, thus limiting their payloads by serving as a long-range, stand-off 'shooting solution' for battlefield commanders, leveraging the key capabilities of both platforms operating in an enhanced, yet traditional 'high-low' capability mix.
      This capability model, established during the Cold War, serves as a potent force structure model for Australia as the nation continues to integrate its own fleet of fifth-generation, F-35A Joint Strike Fighters while also operating fourth and 4.5 generation platforms like the legacy Hornet, Super Hornet and Growler platforms.